A Timeline Of Industrial Revolutions Versus South Africa | DID YOU KNOW: The 4th Industrial Revolution Is The First Industrial Revolution South Africa Is Experiencing As A Free And Democratic Country

Timeline Of Industrial Revolutions – The Fourth Industrial Revolution which is also known as Industry 4.0 or 4IR – is the first Industrial Revolution that South Africa is experiencing as a free and democratic country. So, in this piece of content you’ll get information related to Timeline Of Industrial Revolutions.

It does not however mean that other economical revolutions did not happen in South Africa and the rest of Africa in the past. I will get to this later.


  • Because the demarcation of the summed up area that now is South Africa was colonised in stages, starting with the Cape by the Dutch and later took over by the British, I will call it ‘Project Colonise South Africa.’
  • Industrial Revolutions’ dates are estimates – i.e. of when one industrial revolution starts and the other ends, and they serve to capture an era of when significant revolutionary innovations happened in the world. And although different researchers have different dates, they do not vary significantly.

Read more

This is what nelson Mandela would say about entrepreneurship – a parody speech

[Read with Nelson Mandela voice. This is a parody speech of Nelson Mandela giving encouragement to entrepreneurs. It never took place]

– –

In 1952, Oliver Tambo and I decided to become entrepreneurs. We started South Africa’s first black-owned law firm – Mandela & Tambo – right during apartheid.

In the beginning things were hard, I only had 2 suits. So, don’t laugh at the young entrepreneur you see at conferences wearing the same suit over and over again.

Here is some little advice. Buy a black suit if it will be the only one for a long time. Any other colour will give you off – that you wear the same suit all the time. Read more

Mandela did not sell out; De Klerk and company were pulling

I’m sure most of you saw an article on Mandela’s birthday; titled “Mandela sold blacks out” via News24. I could feel the pain the fella was spilling into the post. Either you sympathized with it; were disgusted by it or felt neutral. Nonetheless it pointed out real points that have a fundamental bearing on the South African economy.

The CODESA negotiations had a number of outcomes which of course directed South Africa’s political and economic future.

Land was to be redistributed per the model known as willing buyer willing seller, private property was to be constitutionally protected, new bill of rights and the South African Reserve Bank remained in private hands.

The Convention of Democratic South Africa produced what it produced and at the same time didn’t produce some aspirations. In many senses our struggle heroes tried their best. Kudos to them! Read more

The attitude that let apartheid persist still prevails

17 years into the so called democracy; a lot has been done but more is still not done. Poverty and unemployment are scourges that still thug our society.

Of recent was the successful economic freedom march which travelled from Johannesburg CBD, to Sandton then finally Pretoria. A distance of approximately 60km travelled over 24 hours straight. Young man and women; mostly unemployed; took part in the march. Read more

Explaining the concept de-colonization to spark prosperity for Africa (ECONOMICS FOR AFRICA) (part 2 of 2)

This is a continuation of the previous article titled “Colonialism/Apartheid – a high interest, long term and lucrative investment for the west”.

Why do you think South Africa is a developing country? Why do you think we do not have our own Nike, Iphone, Mercedes etc? Why don’t we have mighty brands like these walking the world?Here is a silly question: why are white South Africans wealthier than the blacks?

I’m not bitter. In fact I’m up the challenge to transform Africa for the better and for everyone. My senses, emotions and actions are allergic to caring out racism. Still I don’t hate or wish pain upon any racist.

Some may not agree that colonialism was wealth focused. But no one can argue that it suppressed one and made the other wealthier.

I’m hoping at this point we can agree that any challenges in Africa can be conquered with the tool economics (commerce).

Let me get down on it; that is explaining this concept I call de-colonialism. Colonization was international. Apartheid was national. To me they are all the same.

Colonization made the colonizer’s image (products) cooler to buy into. So you don’t hate local products. Colonization embedded such hate into you. That is why we trust Nike or Apple products to any other that would come from us. Excuse the impositions; it’s an easy and quick method of sharing ideas.

So in today’s economy; what the former colonizer makes already has leverage over the former colonized produces. It’s quite a profitable phenomenon for our former colonizers.

I hope you are with me. Colonize them yesterday and sell them your image today. That way you get to pioneer innovation or rather civilization whilst they are picking up the pieces.

In today’s economy and democracy; the former colonizer gets to be the investor. It’s more like the proceeds of colonialism; that is denying further the former colonized ownership of any wealth like legacy.

What do you think was happening in the western world during the struggle? Entrepreneurs where hard at work; as they should; doing their thing. They were gaining momentum in business; being inventive and innovative.

When the doors of opportunity (realization of democracy) where opened in South Africa (and else where); they where better prepared to share their great inventions and innovations with our world.

For (blacks) Africans, it was between being an entrepreneur, the laws which suppressed free enterprising for blacks, fighting for democracy and other social restrictions coloured by apartheid. It must have been impossible; too hard. Although fellas like Richard Maponya really fought a good fight.

Poverty, lack of jobs etc; can be solved through commerce that is sustained and owned by South Africans. I actually think reconciliation is impossible (actually silly) without progressive and just economic themes.

De-colonization requires practicing self love. Love thy country and its aspirations. Again apologies for the impositions in the statements. It’s a quick and easy way of sharing ideas.

An average person today spends has or spent their greater time at work or school if not unemployed. Therefore de-colonization should take place through education and economic activities; since we spend greater time there.

SO. If colonisation and apartheid robbed us of the opportunity to compete in the international arena and gain wealth like legacy; don’t you think we owe it to ourselves to give us that opportunity to catch up?

For any equality or rather economic just and prosperity to take shape; we have to take radical actions. We need to afford ourselves that opportunity to build wealth like legacies. With foreign investment; as we seem to rely on it greatly; non South Africans will continue owning our prosperity and legacy.

The basis of any economy is the consumer. It’s the consumer’s money that makes commerce possible. Where the consumer spends his money is where prosperity falls. So if we as South African consumers want our economy to flourish; we need to spend our demand on us; I’m talking about local products. A general sense of tolerance towards local products ha to be awakened.

Drastic and radical actions have to be taken to improve and propel our society. If the Madela, Sobukwe and Sisulu era scarified greatly for today; we as well have to sacrifice something for tomorrow. Petty sacrifices; like buying local products.

As an outro let me case to you what supporting local products does. E.g. Say the local clothing industry booms by R5 million; in many senses the R5 million will be spend like this: clothing companies are going to rent bigger offices; higher more cleaners, more security, petrol, IT, CMT, fabric, staff etc.

Colonialism/Apartheid – a high interest, long term and lucrative investment for the west (part 1 of 2)

Over next the few paragraphs I will highlight and as well explain why colonialism was a long term investment for the colonisers (the west). And a good one I must say. The interests still show; of course any investor will protect their investment.

FYI: the mighty west did try to invest in Asia though colonialism tactics; Unlike Africa that attempt was not that successful. Read more

Unfortunate or historically robbed. Where to?

Apartheid ended in 1994 apparently; some kept their wine farms and beach front houses; while some kept their Shacks in the Alexandra Townships (the less fortunate).

‘The less fortunate’; is a phrase often used referring the poor. To me unfortunate is an unplanned circumstance. While the poor in this country; are so because of the previously employed strategies of Apartheid and colonialism.

We (blacks) chose reconciliation without justice; which meant; starting from scratch. We mostly were uneducated; unemployed and unskilled. We are where now free participants in the South African economy.

Interventions like RDP; GEAR; affirmative action; BEE and etc, are/were awesome. Apartheid was well planned Read more